Friday, February 11, 2011

Immigration: Far from Black and White


















The desert is not a very comforting place. The sun relentlessly beams down during the day; the frost takes over at night. Almost every plant has thorns or prickles, and natural sources of water are nearly impossible to find. Though the environment may seem harsh, what’s even more discomforting are the stories buried deep within those desert lands.

It was mid-morning on a brisk January day, and my class and I emptied from our buses after a long drive through the desert hills of Arizona. I was aware that migrants coming from Mexico were dying in the desert as they made their perilous journey across the border, but I hadn’t possibly imagined getting so close to this issue. Our class crossed the road and stood behind the guardrail, looking out to the hills, which looked just like all the other hills in Arizona. I gazed out at all of the trees, cacti, and bushes. The terrain appeared to be innocent, lifeless, and untouched, or maybe I was just telling myself that because I didn’t want to believe that migrants are crossing the desert every day. “Sure,” I thought, “They cross the desert, but what’s the likelihood of any of them crossing this EXACT place?” Our task was to walk some of the trails and pick up the trash and belongings that migrants had left behind and by the looks of the seemingly-untouched plants, I hadn’t expected to find much of anything.

As we walked along the trail, the first thing we discovered was a shoe - old, dusty, and beaten. My first reaction was that it was just a random hiker who had lost a shoe, but we continued along a bend in the trail, we found another shoe, the first one’s match. Random hikers don’t drop a pair of shoes. As we continued up the hill, my group and I walked down off the trail into a ditch with some dry shrubs. There were clothes and trash everywhere and I still wanted to believe it was just hiker’s trash. But it definitely wasn’t. I leaned down and gently shook one of the pieces of clothing from the branches. Shaking it out, I saw it was a child’s shirt for a boy no older than 7 years. Among the other trash we found were bottles and cans of various products in Spanish, and most strikingly, a baby bottle.

From a distance, the desert may have seemed untouched, but when I got closer I found that everywhere I looked had evidence of migrants walking the trails. From then on it was impossible to ignore; people do in fact cross the desert every night, even with their young children, their babies. And these are the same “illegal aliens” who smuggle drugs and other illegal things into the country? According to the U.S. Border Patrol, of 18,000 migrant arrests in 2010, only 2,000 were prosecuted for criminal offences other than illegal entry. So what about the other 16,000? They are merely migrant workers who have families like we do, they have a life, a commitment to helping their family survive, just like we do. I want you to ask yourself a question: how extreme would the hardship have to be for you (or your parents) to be willing to risk your own child’s life?

These decisions the migrants are forced to make, like leaving your children behind or risking their lives, are not easy ones. These day-to-day decisions are the dictator of life and death. With an unemployment rate of 5.5% in Mexico, and underemployment as high as 25% (International Index study 2009), it’s no wonder why people are leaving Mexico to find work elsewhere.
The common question is: why don’t these people just wait? Imagine you are the father, mother, or oldest sibling of a family, and you apply for a temporary work visa to go work in the United States and send money back to your family as their only support, but you get told you have no chance, and must wait anywhere from 6 to 20 years, and in some cases even longer. Could you sit back and accept the fact that your family will lose your home, and eventually starve to death if you don’t do anything? Is all of that pain and suffering really worth the honor that you came to the country legally? These people don’t want to come here, they need to.

Regardless of legal or illegal status, migrant workers provide so many benefits that are impossible to ignore, and are nearly the backbone of the economy in the U.S.. Seventy-seven percent of all farmworkers were born in Mexico (BOCES Geneseo Migrant Center), if none of those people could work in our country, it would become increasingly difficult for farms to produce and distribute their crops, therefore resulting in a spike in prices of food. These migrant workers are more closely connected to your life than you may think, and more connected than you may want to think.

The media today portrays all immigrants as being evil people with terrible intentions, but what those people don’t see are those children’s clothes and baby bottles in the desert, the stories of poverty and starvation in Mexico, and the ever-present benefits migrant workers bring to the U.S. economy. For years and years, the government has been dumping money into building walls and strengthening border patrol, yet barely any mentions of true immigration reform. The majority of U.S. citizens will never see these statistics on the percentage of migrant arrests of people who are actually participating in illegal acts other than hopping the border wall, which is simply because the stories and facts about these migrants are rarely in the spotlight of the media. This makes it nearly impossible for the average American citizen to be educated enough on the issue to make important political decisions that effect everyone. Who are we, as American citizens, to go around building walls and criminalizing anyone who crosses them, when we’ve never been faced with the fact that our families will die if we don’t seek work our country simply cannot offer? Who are we to judge and punish when we simply do not understand?

The only way to begin to fix this issue is to open the U.S. citizens’ eyes to the immigration issue and it’s true colors, and push aside the black and white views we’re stuck in today. I’m not asking to take down the border wall and let migrants come freely, and I’m not claiming to have any other sort of solution for this problem - yet. All I’m asking is for you to form your own opinions and better yet, share them with every opportunity. If the government isn’t doing anything to solve the immigration problem now, it’s our responsibility as U.S. citizens to get the ball rolling.

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Global Warming: Decide the Fate Before It's Too Late

Imagine a world 10 degrees hotter than in is today, no arctic ice, no coral reefs, and sea levels risen to drown countless coastal cities. This is our planet if nothing is done about Global Warming.

It’s no recent news that Global Warming exists and that it is indeed an issue. However, 28% of Americans still don’t believe Global Warming is real. Carbon dioxide emissions have increased by 20% in the last century due to human activities. The average global temperatures have raised 1.4˚F, and in places like Alaska and western Canada, the increase in temperature is as severe as 7˚F in only the last 50 years.

Temperature changes aren’t the only effects of global warming. Acording to the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sea levels have been projected to rise 2 feet in the next 100 years, which would displace millions of people living in coastal areas.

The EPA has also projected that, if the emission trends continue, the coral reefs will be completely destroyed by 2050. This is most likely within your lifetime.

According to The World Health Organization, 150,000 deaths per year are due to the effects of global warming such as extreme weather, drought, heat waves, decreased food production and the increased spread of diseases like malaria. Although Americans are used to the luxury of clean tap water, air conditioning, seemingly endless food supply, and vaccinations, some people in the world are less fortunate, and are not invincible to the effects of global warming.

The only effects United States citizens are seeing is a 1˚F rise in the average temperature and a 5% increase of precipitation, surely we can’t be THAT responsible for global warming?

Well, not exactly.

The United States only makes up 4.5% of the global population, but is responsible for 25% of global carbon dioxide emissions (second highest in the world, second only to China). The European Union (EU) makes up 7.3% of the global population and is responsible 15% of global carbon dioxide emissions. In other words, the EU is about 1.6 times larger than the US, but the US is responsible for 10% more of the global carbon dioxide emissions than every European country put together.

So what are these European countries doing that we aren’t?

Europe has always had slightly stricter emission standards than the US, but the problem can’t be fixed solely by standards and regulations. After all, we all know that us Americans “want our government out of our business”, including the tailpipes of our cars.
I want you to ask yourself, how often do you ride a public bus, the light rail, a train? How about your family members? Your neighbors? 10% of Europeans use these means of travel every day, versus 2% of Americans.

8% difference of people who use public transit in the US vs. Europe, 10% difference of carbon dioxide emissions in the US vs. Europe.

It’s not hard to imagine why Americans don’t use public transit as avidly as Europeans; most cities in the United States don’t have easily accessible and/or cheap public transit. Yearly passes for the Metro system in Paris are free to residents of the Île-de-France region, and they can be used for the bike rental system as well. A monthly pass for the New York subway and public buses is $89.

You’re probably wondering how the French government can afford to provide public transit for free, and unfortunately, the answer is a word most Americans cringe at: Taxes.
France introduced a payroll tax dedicated solely to public transportation; the only payroll taxes in the US are social security (FICA), Medicare, Federal tax, and Individual state tax (if applicable). By having a specific fund for public transportation, France is dedicating money to be spent directly to public transportation; therefore it continues to be functioning and available to every French citizen. Since the United States only dedicates a portion of tax money to public transportation within a pool of tax money that goes to many other things, it makes it more difficult for the government to improve the system and make it less costly for citizens.

I’m not saying the only solution to reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the US is to raise taxes for public transportation; it’s just a matter of where the taxes go. Until this happens, there are many things you can do. Consider public transportation, ride your bike, walk, turn off your lights when you leave the room. This is your planet, so love it. We don’t get another one.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Political Segregation: The Blinders on the Eyes of Democracy

I am a very strong liberal. I have my ways of thinking what “should” and “shouldn’t” happen with the government, the economy, society, etc. It would be great for me if everyone else thought exactly like me, but unfortunately, not everyone does. This is why extremes don’t work in modern politics.

President Bush and the Republican Party are a prime example. They were extreme, and infuriated a lot of democrats, this in turn forced the republicans to retaliate and become more extreme themselves, which in turn forced the democrats to become even more extreme, and now there is a deep segregation of beliefs and most interactions are negative and anger based. Now what happens when you get these parties together in congress? Nothing gets done because they can never come to an agreement.

The easiest way to retaliate against an opponent is to get angry at them and oversimplify things. This is amplified through the media. The truth is, there is not such extreme political segregation among society as the media portrays. A Stanford University political scientist by the name of Morris Fiorina observed that the media finds the most extreme people in society to back up their beliefs, when in reality, all of America is not that polarized. We have our significant differences in social and moral issues like abortion and gay marriage, but when it comes down to economic specifics, the extremes are not commonly seen. Since politicians are under the harsh magnifying glass of the media, we are only going to hear the things the media wants us to hear, i.e, the things that make us mad.

Sure, I’d love it if we all agreed to raise taxes and cut military spending, but we don’t. In order to run a country properly, everyone needs to be involved. This means the country must have leaders that are not extreme and are willing to pull from both sides since the only way to make everyone happy is to include everyone’s views. However, modern politics and the media have made it so we can’t just “meet in the middle”. Political parties have become more focused on making decisions that will give their party a good reputation among likeminded people, and that will make the other party look bad, rather than focusing on what the country as a whole actually needs.

If a candidate who swung back and forth between parties on political issues ran, they would never get elected, or even nominated, because people are afraid of someone who “can’t make up their mind”, but do they realize it’s the only way things will ever get done in the government? Our government has become more of the two parties bickering and bashing each other simply because it’s the “norm” in their party, and therefore the true care and attention for what society needs has been lost. When I say society, I don’t just mean the groups of people that political parties and their accompanying candidates try to appeal to, I mean EVERYONE. Democrats, republicans, liberals, conservatives, men, women, majorities, minorities, dogs, and cats of all kinds.

But what can we do about this problem? Are we going to go on for the rest of eternity with the same uninformative, nasty, party-bashing politics we have today?

No.

We abandon the parties. We have taken the labels “Democrat” and “Republican” and turned them into labels of lifestyle, far beyond political beliefs. Until a person can clearly articulate their individual political beliefs and values, they become a political lamb who conforms to the beliefs that “the other side” is wrong, simply because they’re the other side. Even worse, the political lambs check out of the system entirely because it’s “too confusing” or “not important” or “doesn’t apply to me”. We all know one of those people. Since we’re so distracted with our labels, why not just take them away to help everyone focus on the raw facts of the issues and important decisions involved with politics?

You may be thinking that this would cause complete turmoil in our political world, but think about it: right now if you’re a democrat you will probably vote for the democrat just because he’s a democrat, and not even consider the republican candidate, because since he’s a republican, so he’s probably wrong. What if people didn’t know the labels of the candidates, and were therefore forced to research where they stand and make their decision based on weather or not they agree with their fundamentals.

There would obviously be trends between the “democratic” and “republican” candidates and the people who vote for either, but it would help society get away from the beliefs forced upon them by their parties, and to get away from the political bashing of one party versus another. This in turn would help open society’s eyes and force them to make decisions of what THEY think is right for the country, not what THEIR PARTY says is right for the country. Although abolishing political labels immediately is not realistic, the idea of shifting society towards not caring about the labels is what can motivate people to think for themselves.

Think for yourself, vote for yourself, and break down the walls of political segregation; the blinders on the eyes of our democracy.

Bennet vs. Buck; The Choice for Colorado

I’ve been sulking around, coughing and sneezing, anxiously awaiting this coming election. I’m counting on all of you to get out and vote, so I figured I should inform you, my dear citizens, about some candidates and their policies, to help you take a stand
I’ve spent the last few days analyzing Ken Buck and Michael Bennet, a quite interesting situation, I must say.

A little bit about Michael Bennet (adapted from his campaign website http://www.bennetforcolorado.org):
  • He was the former Superintendent of Denver Public Schools
  • Served two years as Chief of Staff under Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper.
  • He was the Managing Director of the Anschutz Investment Company

A little bit about Ken Buck (adapted from his campaign website http://www.buckforcolorado.com/):
  • Served as the Weld County District Attorney
  • Worked as a prosecutor with the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C
  • He has volunteered and served on the boards including, A Woman's Place, North Range Behavioral Health, Juvenile Assessment Center, PAVE (promoting alternatives to violence), Fresh Start, a charter school for expelled students, the Genesis Project, and the Restorative Justice Coalition.

I searched a bit on votesmart.org, just to find that both candidatesrefused to tell citizens where he/she stands on any of the issues addressed in the 2010 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart, national media, and prominent political leaders.

Oh? Well what exactly are they hiding from us? The people from votesmart.org were, however, able to create a short list of certain issues and where the candidates stand.



Michael Bennet:
http://www.votesmart.org




 Ken Buck:


Even though the candidates aren’t as open with their policies as some citizens might prefer, it wouldn’t hurt to analyze the information we do have and take a stand.

The first thing to consider is what our country needs:

  • Lower debt
  • Improve education
  • Improve environment health (yes people, our planet, along with our democracy is dying, you might want to pay attention)


Michael Bennet has experience in the financial business, in turn giving him experience necessary for dealing with debt. Ken Buck was… a prosecutor?

Michael Bennet is the former Superintendent of Denver Public Schools, in turn giving him the experience of interacting with teachers, parents, and students. Ken Buck… worked on a committee to help a charter school for expelled students?

Ken Buck does not support using government funds to improve the economy, federal education standards for K-12 students, or environmental regulations to reduce the effects of climate change. So, what exactly is he planning on doing while in office?

From the perspective of your precious democracy, I want you to get out and take a stand. Maybe debt, education, and the environment aren’t important to you? Maybe they are? I don’t care. If you’re of age, go out and vote. I’ve given my two cents, and its time for you to give yours. I’m weak, sick, tired, and struggling. The only way you can help me is to take a stand. I’ve given you some information to help you start, so don’t give up now.